Wages & Overtime

While an “honest days’ work for an honest days’ pay” seems like a simple concept, many employers still find ways to deny hardworking employees the wages they earn and are entitled to receive. We can help.

  • Employees covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act must receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than time and one-half their regular rates of pay (1.5x). There is no limit on the number of hours employees work in any workweek.

    Overtime requirements apply on a workweek basis. An employee's workweek is seven consecutive 24-hour periods. It need not coincide with the calendar week but may begin on any day and at any hour of the day. Averaging of hours over two or more weeks is not permitted. Normally, overtime pay earned in a particular workweek must be paid on the regular payday for the pay period in which the wages were earned.

    An employee’s regular rate of pay cannot be less than the minimum wage. An employee’s regular rate of pay does not include amounts paid for expenses incurred on the employer's behalf, premium payments for overtime work, discretionary bonuses, and payments for vacation, holidays, or sick leave. An employee’s regular rate of pay is calculated by dividing the total pay for employment (except for the exclusions noted above) in any workweek by the total number of hours actually worked.

    Overtime Pay May Not Be Waived: The overtime requirement may not be waived by agreement between the employer and employees. An agreement that only 8 hours a day or only 40 hours a week will be counted as working time also fails the test of FLSA compliance. An announcement by the employer that no overtime work will be permitted or that overtime work will not be paid for unless authorized in advance also will not impair the employee's right to compensation for overtime hours that are worked.

    When state law differs from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, an employer generally must comply with the standard most protective to employees.

    Employers may try to avoid minimum wage and overtime requirements by treating employees as independent contractors or as subject to some other exemption such as professional, administrative, or executive exemptions when, in fact, no exclusion or exemption applies.

  • The minimum wage and overtime provisions of the FLSA cover non-management employees in production, maintenance, construction, and similar occupations, such as carpenters, electricians, mechanics, plumbers, delivery drivers, repair technicians, iron workers, craftsmen, operating engineers, longshoremen, construction workers, and laborers. These employees are entitled to minimum wage and overtime premium pay under the FLSA, no matter how highly paid they might be.

    Such nonexempt “blue-collar” employees gain the skills and knowledge required for the performance of their routine manual and physical work through apprenticeships and on-the-job training.

  • Federal regulations, including 29 C.F.R. § 541.3, provide that police officers, detectives, deputy sheriffs, state troopers, highway patrol officers, investigators, inspectors, correctional officers, parole or probation officers, park rangers, firefighters, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, ambulance personnel, rescue workers, hazardous materials workers, and similar employees (“first responders”) are entitled to minimum wage and overtime premium pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

  • Registered nurses who are paid on an hourly basis should receive overtime pay. However, registered nurses who are registered by the appropriate State examining board generally meet the requirements for the learned professional exemption and, if paid on a salary basis of at least $684 per week,

    May be classified as exempt and not entitled to premium pay for overtime.

    However, licensed practical nurses and other similar health care employees generally do not qualify as exempt learned professionals, regardless of work experience and training, because possessing a specialized advanced academic degree is not a standard prerequisite for entry into such occupations and they are entitled to overtime pay.

  • Section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act provides an exemption from both minimum wage and overtime pay for employees employed as bona fide executive, administrative, professional and outside sales employees. To qualify for exemption, employees generally must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $684 per week. Job titles do not determine exempt status. In order for an exemption to apply, an employee’s specific job duties and salary must meet all the requirements of the Department’s regulations. If these requirements are not met, the employee is entitled to minimum wage and overtime under the FLSA.

  • To qualify for the administrative employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:

    The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $684 per week. The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers and

    The employee’s primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance.

  • To qualify for the executive employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:

    The employee must be compensated on a salary basis at a rate not less than $684 per week;

    The employee’s primary duty must be managing the enterprise or a customarily recognized department or subdivision of the enterprise;

    The employee must customarily and regularly direct the work of at least two or more other full-time employees or their equivalent and

    The employee must have the authority to hire or fire other employees, or the employee’s suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion, or any other change of status of other employees must be given particular weight.

  • To qualify for the learned professional employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:

    The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $684* per week;

    The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring advanced knowledge, defined as work which is predominantly intellectual in character and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment;

    The advanced knowledge must be in a field of science or learning; and

    The advanced knowledge must be customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.

  • To qualify for the outside sales employee exemption, all of the following tests must be met:

    The employee’s primary duty must be making sales (as defined in the FLSA), or obtaining orders or contracts for services or for the use of facilities for which a consideration will be paid by the client or customer; and

    The employee must be customarily and regularly engaged away from the employer’s place or places of business.

Recent FLSA Cases

  • The Complaint alleged that IntelliQuick knowingly misclassified its drivers or couriers as independent contractors, failed to accurate track and record all hours worked, failed to pay drivers statutorily required minimum wages and overtime wages and made unlawful deductions from the drivers’ earned compensation in violation of the FLSA and Arizona wage statutes. Martin & Bonnett won partial motions for summary judgment, establishing that Plaintiffs had been misclassified, the personal liability of the company’s owner, and the company’s willful violations. Before trial on the amount of damages owed, the parties reached a $5.5 million settlement. More information on this case can be found here and on the case website.

    Collinge, et al v. IntelliQuick Delivery, Inc., et al:

  • Martin & Bonnett, together with co-counsel Getman, Sweeney & Dunn, and Edward Tuddenham, litigated claims on behalf of a class of approximately 20,000 drivers who leased trucks from Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC (“IEL”) and signed contractor agreements to drive those trucks for Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC (“Swift”). The case alleges that Swift, IEL, and two individuals named Chad Killebrew and Jerry Moyes misclassified drivers as independent contractors, failed to pay them minimum wages, violated the federal forced labor statute, and that drivers’ leases and contractor agreements were unconscionable. The parties reached a $100-million-dollar settlement, which was preliminary approved by the Court in April 2019. A final settlement hearing is scheduled for January 2020.

    Van Dusen v. Swift Transportation Company:

  • Martin & Bonnett, together with co-counsel Getman, Sweeney & Dunn, and Edward Tuddenham, litigated claims on behalf of a class of approximately 1,350 truck drivers who leased trucks from Central Leasing, Inc. (CLI) and were treated as “owner operators” by Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., one of the nation’s largest trucking companies. Plaintiffs alleged they were misclassified as “independent contractors” and that Central Refrigerated made unlawful deductions from the drivers’ wages, misrepresented the amount they would make as owner operators, and engaged in a scheme of “forced labor” coercing them to drive for Central Refrigerated even though it was unprofitable, under threat they would be liable for excessive charges and be subject to a negative driver reports (DAC reports) if they tried to leave. On April 3, 2018, the Court granted final approval of a settlement, including more than 300 individual arbitrations and the collective arbitration for FLSA claims filed in the case.

    Cilluffo, et al., v. Central Refrigerated Services, Inc., et al: