Wages & Overtime

While an “honest days’ work for an honest days’ pay” seems like a simple concept, many employers still find ways to deny hardworking employees the wages they’ve earned.

We can help.

Recent FLSA Cases

  • The Complaint alleged that IntelliQuick knowingly misclassified its drivers or couriers as independent contractors, failed to accurate track and record all hours worked, failed to pay drivers statutorily required minimum wages and overtime wages and made unlawful deductions from the drivers’ earned compensation in violation of the FLSA and Arizona wage statutes. Martin & Bonnett won partial motions for summary judgment, establishing that Plaintiffs had been misclassified, the personal liability of the company’s owner, and the company’s willful violations. Before trial on the amount of damages owed, the parties reached a $5.5 million settlement. More information on this case can be found here and on the case website.

  • Martin & Bonnett, together with co-counsel Getman, Sweeney & Dunn, and Edward Tuddenham, litigated claims on behalf of a class of approximately 20,000 drivers who leased trucks from Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC (“IEL”) and signed contractor agreements to drive those trucks for Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC (“Swift”). The case alleges that Swift, IEL, and two individuals named Chad Killebrew and Jerry Moyes misclassified drivers as independent contractors, failed to pay them minimum wages, violated the federal forced labor statute, and that drivers’ leases and contractor agreements were unconscionable. The parties reached a $100-million-dollar settlement, which was preliminary approved by the Court in April 2019. A final settlement hearing is scheduled for January 2020.

  • Martin & Bonnett, together with co-counsel Getman, Sweeney & Dunn, and Edward Tuddenham, litigated claims on behalf of a class of approximately 1,350 truck drivers who leased trucks from Central Leasing, Inc. (CLI) and were treated as “owner operators” by Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., one of the nation’s largest trucking companies. Plaintiffs alleged they were misclassified as “independent contractors” and that Central Refrigerated made unlawful deductions from the drivers’ wages, misrepresented the amount they would make as owner operators, and engaged in a scheme of “forced labor” coercing them to drive for Central Refrigerated even though it was unprofitable, under threat they would be liable for excessive charges and be subject to a negative driver reports (DAC reports) if they tried to leave. On April 3, 2018, the Court granted final approval of a settlement, including more than 300 individual arbitrations and the collective arbitration for FLSA claims filed in the case.